stand your ground

  • May 14, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    As the campaign continues to encourage supporters of the right-wing advocacy group, the American Legislative Exchange Council, better known as ALEC, to rethink their support of the group, The Huffington Post’s Dan Froomkin reveals the group’s efforts to help its members fend off pesky questions about its corporate backers.

    Froomkin says a memo, obtained by Common Cause, was sent to ALEC members essentially telling them to try and change the subject. “The model answers,” Froomkin writes, “provided by ALEC have the consistent theme of attempting to obscure the influence of its corporate members and to shift emphasis onto the role of legislators, whose dues comprise only 2 percent of the group’s budget, according to an analysis by the Center for Media and Democracy.”

    For years ALEC has crafted model legislation for state lawmakers advancing interests of corporate America, as well as Religious Right outfits and the National Rifle Association, usually with little media notice. Bu that changed after Florida’s so-called “Stand Your Ground” law drew national coverage.

    Although ALEC has argued that laws, such as the Stand Your Ground Law, which garnered national attention after the killing of the Florida youngster Trayvon Martin, are wholly the product of state lawmakers, high-profile commentators have noted that the group and its work is funded largely by big corporations.

    In late March, Matt Gertz of Media Matters noted that the Florida law, which provides great legal protection to people who shoot others outside their homes, is “virtually identical to Section 1 of ALEC’s Castle Doctrine Act ….” 

    A coalition of groups, including ColorOfChange and CMD, has urged corporate sponsors to pay closer attention to the work of ALEC and to stop supporting it. More than a dozen corporations have severed ties with ALEC, including Johnson & Johnson, PepsiCo., and Blue Cross Blue Shield. ColorOfChange recently announced that the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards has ceased support of ALEC.

  • April 18, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    The public interest groups fighting to temper the influence of the well-funded rightist outfit that helped write Florida’s so-called Stand Your Ground law, and lobby other states to enact similar measures, are not easing their efforts to encourage corporate America to rethink its support of the group.

    After ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, announced that it was shuttering its dubiously dubbed “Public Safety and Elections” task force, which pushed the Stand Your Ground laws and other measures to suppress voting, groups, such as ColorOfChange denounced the move as a desperate effort to stop corporate sponsors from fleeing.

    ALEC’s latest statement is nothing more than a PR stunt aimed at diverting attention from its agenda, which has done serious damage to our communities,” said ColorOfChange Executive Director Rashad Robinson.

    In announcing its move, ALEC said in a press release that it was redoubling its “efforts on the economic front, a priority that has been the hallmark of our organization for decades,” which is apparently all about helping corporations reap greater profits.

    The tragic death of the Florida youngster Trayvon Martin (pictured) at the hands of a so-called neighborhood watchman, sparked national outrage and drew attention to the Stand Your Ground Laws, which a New York Times columnist wrote is “tempting to dismiss” as “the work of ignorant yahoos.” (For instance one could image a yahoo, such as the lame, one-hit-wonder, washed-out “rocker,” Ted Nugent, as itching for this type of law, which essentially gives legal protection to those who kill others outside their homes, if they claim they did so in self-defense.)

    But, the Stand Your Ground law was strongly backed by the NRA, which the yahoo Nugent is a member, and essentially the product of ALEC, which has enjoyed years of corporate backing.

    After Martin’s death, ColorOfChange and other public interest groups launched a campaign to educate corporations about ALEC’s real agenda.

    The campaign has had success, prompting 11 corporations to cut its ties to ALEC, and irking the right-wing editorial board of The Wall Street Journal, which whined about “the bullying of big business.”

  • April 11, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    While a Florida special prosecutor has finally lodged a second-degree murder charge against George Zimmerman, the so-called neighborhood watchman, who killed an unarmed Florida youngster Trayvon Martin, a public interest group is having success at pulling corporate support from the right-wing organization that has played a major role in the proliferation of the troubling Stand Your Ground laws.

    Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law provides significant legal protections to those who kill others outside their homes, claiming they used lethal force in self-defense. Traditionally the law has provided some protection to those who use lethal means to protect themselves while in their homes. The Stand Your Ground laws go much farther and have been described as cowboy-esque.

    As The New York Times columnist Paul Krugman recently noted “it’s tempting to dismiss this law as the work of ignorant yahoos. But similar laws have been pushed across the nation, not by ignorant yahoos but by big corporations.”

    Krugman was referring to the right-wing group ALEC, which has the backing of the Koch brothers, “Exxon Mobile, and so on.” As noted in this ACSblog post, ALEC essentially wrote the law for Florida, and likely provided the model for the twenty-some other states that have similarly ridiculous laws, which promote “vigilante (in)justice,” as Krugman put it.

    The public interest group, ColorOfChange has launched a campaign to urge corporate sponsors to stop supporting the work of ALEC. In an April 11 blog post, the group notes that Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, McDonald’s and Wendy’s have all “parted ways with ALEC since ColorOfChange launched its effort late last year.”

  • March 23, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    As scrutiny of so-called “stand your ground” laws builds in the aftermath of the killing of Florida youngster Trayvon Martin, President Obama weighed in today calling Martin’s death a tragedy.

    After his announcement of the nomination of Dr. Jim Kim to lead the World Bank, Obama was asked about the young African American’s death at the hands of a so-called neighborhood watchman in Sanford, Fla.

    Obama said, “I can only imagine what these parents are going through. And when I think about this boy, I think about my own kids. And I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this, and that everybody pulls together – federal, state and local – to figure out exactly how this tragedy happened.”

    The president added, “But my main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon. And I think they are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves, and that we’re going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened.”

    Obama noted, that he could not elaborate at much greater length; the Department of Justice had opened an investigation into the matter earlier this week. Pressure has been building for the federal government to take action because Florida officials have not arrested the shooter, George Zimmerman, because of the state’s expansive law that provides greater protection to those who claim self-defense in using deadly force. The Florida Conference of NAACP Branches had urged the federal government to get involved, saying it had no confidence in Florida officials to handle the matter.

  • March 22, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    The tragic slaying of a Trayvon Martin, an unarmed 17-year-old in Florida, is drawing scrutiny, albeit far too late, of public policy that celebrates a Wild West mentality.

    The law, enacted in 2005, dubbed “stand your ground,” provides great legal protection to those who kill others outside their homes, claiming they used deadly violence in self-defense. Under pressure from outraged citizens and public interest groups, such as the NAACP, the U.S. Department of Justice said earlier this week it would investigate the killing of the young African American.

    Part of the mounting pressure included 911 recordings that revealed that George Zimmerman, a “watchman” for a Sanford, a community near Orlando, was ordered to stay put as police had been dispatched to the area. The 911 recordings also reveal that Zimmerman, a large, 28 year-old, refused to heed the 911 operator’s plea, responding, “They always get away,” before leaving his car to pursue the youngster.

    In a piece for The Nation, Bryce Covert says the so-called stand your ground laws, which have been adopted by 20 other states, are not only rooted in romanticism of a “cowboy-esque” mentality, but also in a “deep distrust in the police force.”

    “Beyond emboldening individual actors,” Covert continues, “this distrust has real consequences on police forces’ ability to ensure protection and justice. It weakens and distorts the force itself.”

    As noted recently by The New York Times, the Florida law was pushed by the National Rifle Association. Likely not terribly surprising was the involvement of the conservative lobbying group, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

    Writing for Media Matters for America, Matt Gertz notes that Florida’s law is “virtually identical to Section 1 of ALEC’s Castle Doctrine Act model legislation as posted on the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD). According to CMD, the model bill was adopted by ALEC’s Civil Justice Task in August 2005 – just a few short months after it passed the Florida legislature – and approved by its board of directors the following month.”